For anyone looking for that post, here's a direct link to that dicussion. http://groups.google.com/group/qsb-mac-discuss/t/1cf24fc8dde61d69 I must say, I'm alittle disappointed that Alcor is leaving QS to work on QSB mainly. I don't feel too comfortable using QSB mainly b/c it's google and fear more of data will be forked over to google. Secondly, it still isn't a QS replacement. As many people pointed out things are still missing from QS: proxies, comma trick, etc. I would like some of this code to used in QS but i doubt it. I really want my QS not be google powered.
On Jan 14, 12:04 am, ari <[email protected]> wrote: > Nevermind, there's an updated post from Alcor on the QSB forum. > > Thanks > > ari wrote: > > OK, now i'm really confused. > > > Nothing from Etienne in over a month now, nothing at all from Alcor on > > anything Alchemy or Elements related. Are any of the projects alive? > > I saw the QSB announcement and could only be filled with dread as all > > the great things about QS I have been missing were not to be. I saw a > > few posts from Alcor on those forums but it seems he is intentionally > > keeping his silence regarding the "real" QS (or has been asked to by > > Google in order to work on GSB). I am beginning to wonder if someone > > should start collecting donations to hire someone from Elance or > > someone else in the community to work on the source of QS that's been > > released thus far just so we can be heading in the general direction > > of a refreshed release with all the things people have been asking for > > and hoping for. > > > QS is still dreadfully unstable for me with almost any release. > > > Alcor, Etienne, anyone - can we get a brief update as to your > > intentions going forward?
