On Jan 16, 6:27 am, smc <[email protected]> wrote:
> The big difference, is that QSB is traded by a giant corporation, and
> QS is (or was?) a product made by independent developers. I don't like
> to hit double cmd to see Google's (horrible) logo in my screen.
You make a valid point. How do you feel about the apple logos all over
your OS? a necessary evil?
Is there a fundamental difference between an advertising driven
company and a sales driven company?
If it really is the branding that bothers you, it looks like you could
use the open source version. The logos are more generic.
;) (or LaunchBar—as you mentioned—they are definitely worth
supporting)
>
> Personally I'm switching to LauchBar 5.
>
> Anyway, thanks for your work.
>
> On Jan 15, 5:57 pm, AIcor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > ari, howard,
>
> > Howard was right with everything he pointed out.
>
> > Ari, I understand your concerns, but you should understand that my
> > goals have never changed. I have the same requirements as always,
> > simply a different vessel to explore them. If you look back at the
> > first version of QS, you'll see that QSB is very close in
> > functionality to that. It took years to bring QS's vast library of
> > actions to fruition, but that was with one part-time developer. This
> > time, the code is all there. I cannot promise anything on behalf of
> > Google, but QSB is open source. QS is open source, and I am still
> > driven by the ideas that created QS in the first place.
