Yes
On Jul 27, 8:58 pm, Howard Melman <[email protected]> wrote: > It's better than using the QS web search plugin with a trigger and the > current selection proxy object? > > Howard > > On Jul 27, 2009, at 1:55 PM, sgmiller wrote: > > > > > > > I just swtiched to LB last week because of QS crashes. I wasn't using > > custom triggers but I am totally satisfied with LB. In fact, I like it > > much better chiefly because of the search templates. I do many, many > > Google phrases searches during a day and with LB, I can do them in a > > couple of keystrokes as opposed to the multiples it took before. > > > HIghly recommended. > > > On Jul 26, 4:35 pm, pendolino <[email protected]> wrote: > >> i was wondering what experiences people have had moving to Launchbar > >> from Quicksilver. The single biggest drawback I noticed was the lack > >> of triggers and it was so significant that I moved back within two > >> days. > > >> I do have to mention that LB appeared more stable and quite > >> responsive > >> when compared to QS. The latter seems to hang from time to time and > >> is > >> not very amenable to experimentation. > > >> If Launchbar supported triggers then I would be very tempted to move > >> but I am also apprehensive about the coming snow leopard since I have > >> had mixed results with the beta version I have been testing on a > >> secondary machine. > > >> If any others her have some pointers or views on launchbar ( didn't > >> see anything with a forum search here ) then please share them. > > >> Thanks.
