On Feb 11, 2011, at 3:55 AM, yokull wrote: > https://github.com/quicksilver is now THE central repo for all qs dev going > forward?
Yes. > the wiki build instructions provide the correct process and behaviour for > building quicksilver, but the instructions (and many notes) do not. what is > the story here? i can make the necessary changes to my fork and push them. is > this fine, or is there something else going on i need to be made aware of? Which are wrong? The ones in the README with the source? > is anyone making available (or intending to make) regular alpha builds? this > would be a valuable resource in getting people re-excited/re-kindled with qs > if FREQUENT developments are provided to the public. it would be a VERY > welcome change in contrast to the history of qs silence Can’t answer that. > if regular builds are to be offered (i can potentially provide this), what > are the target architectures/systems for qs? 10.4? 10.6 and up only? ppc? > hackintosh on vic-20? 10.5+. I would say Intel-only unless someone objects. > goddammit i hate google groups :). can we migrate to something else? I hate the web-based forum interface, if that’s what you mean. Here’s an obscure note from the wiki that you had little hope of ever running across. :) “Google Groups can be used via the web interface, or they can be used like a mailing list. To subscribe to the mailing list, send a message to [email protected] from the address you want to subscribe with.” Needless to say, this is how I use the group. -- Rob McBroom <http://www.skurfer.com/>
