thnx 4 the reply rob
> - the wiki build instructions provide the correct process and behaviour > for building quicksilver, but the instructions (and many notes) do not. > what > is the story here? i can make the necessary changes to my fork and push > them. is this fine, or is there something else going on i need to be made > aware of? > > > Which are wrong? The ones in the README with the source? > hmmm, ya i was referring to the README on github but realized i still had build settings from http://qsapp.com/wiki/Building_Quicksilver didn't try to do a "build & run" right after a fresh clone, but i think the xcode build settings were already properly config'd for that i also assumed that README was out of date is the "a few notes on working with git" still valid? are there any issues still outstanding here? does it look like "git submodules" might be helpful with this? i'm unsure about the svn side-effects here... > - is anyone making available (or intending to make) regular alpha > builds? this would be a valuable resource in getting people > re-excited/re-kindled with qs if FREQUENT developments are provided to the > public. it would be a VERY welcome change in contrast to the history of qs > silence > > > Can’t answer that. > > > - if regular builds are to be offered (i can potentially provide this), > what are the target architectures/systems for qs? 10.4? 10.6 and up only? > ppc? hackintosh on vic-20? > > > 10.5+. I would say Intel-only unless someone objects. > ok, if development picks up a good pace, it would be nice to offer some dev-alpha builds for debug/troubleshooting purposes as well i just tried out latest gold-master of xcode4 as well, and apparently it's not including the 10.5 SDK just made a build and seems good so far not sure if there are any 10.5 dependencies, or anything using 10.5 that can be dropped in order to improve performance, etc. > - goddammit i hate google groups :). can we migrate to something else? > > > I hate the web-based forum interface, if that’s what you mean. Here’s an > obscure note from the wiki <http://qsapp.com/wiki/Where_is_everything?> that > you had little hope of ever running across. :) > > “Google Groups can be used via the web interface, or they can be used like > a mailing list. To subscribe to the mailing list, send a message to > [email protected] from the address you want to subscribe > with.” > > Needless to say, this is how I use the group. > > (the wiki link didn't exist?) ya, the interface is just one of the many things that constantly annoy me with it i prefer using their mobile interface on the desktop https://groups.google.com/forum/m/ i figure since there's been a recent quicksilver migration to all things "new", "improved", and "interesting", i was hoping the same thing could apply to something like tender <http://tenderapp.com/> (they have free accounts for open-source projects) doesn't have to be them specifically, but anything else anyone has in mind is fine same w/ bug reporting if anyone feels like it's not working well looks like github is fine by all (fine by me too) thnx, yokull
