> OK. You mean to change the location they check for Frameworks? That, and some of the .xccodeprojes (nice word!) are still set to use base SDK 10.4 and XCodeproj for 2.1 etc. which gives 'null' on my SL installation.
On 16 April 2011 12:30, Rob McBroom <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 15, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Patrick Robertson wrote: > > > I like the idea of just using the application in question's Icon, like it > is for the Safari proxy. Adding a label may be a good idea, but it won't > show in all interfaces. > > This is what I went with for the OmniWeb update. It seems to be working > out, but I wonder if parenthetical text in addition to the icon would be > less confusing for some. I don’t think we can add details (the second line) > anyway. I’ve tried it on other proxy objects and it never shows up. I think > it might be because the proxies all end being QSBasicObject instead of > QSObject. > > > I agree, small fixes to the plugins so it doesn't look like they're > dormant (and it'd also help us update any .xccodeproj files) > > > OK. You mean to change the location they check for Frameworks? > > -- > Rob McBroom > <http://www.skurfer.com/> > >
