Have the Increase/Decrease Rating actions been removed?

On Jan 19, 3:24 pm, Rob McBroom <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyone else tired of limping along with a 5-year-old iTunes plug-in? One that 
> is utterly confused by the presence of those new-fangled videos and PDFs in 
> your library? And what the heck is an “album artist”? I have good news for 
> you.
>
> Here's a summary of changes (released earlier today):
>
>   * Complete documentation (use the info button in the Plug-ins prefs)
>   * Major speed increase when playing
>   * Major speed increase when “right arrowing” into iTunes.app
>   * New actions
>     * Open Booklet(s) (for albums that include PDF booklets)
>     * Reveal in iTunes (for playlists)
>     * Add to playlist… (select a playlist in the third pane)
>   * Album Artist is now respected when browsing and playing
>   * Multiple tracks, albums, artists, etc. can now be selected and acted on 
> using the comma trick
>   * Video support
>     * Poster frame is used as the icon
>     * iTunes becomes the active application when playing video
>     * Videos are identified by type (Music, Movie, TV Show, etc.)
>     * A preference allows videos to be ignored when playing an album/artist 
> that includes them
>     * Artwork for an album is no longer broken for those containing videos
>   * Party Shuffle renamed to iTunes DJ
>   * New "Random Track" proxy object
>   * Booklets are ignored when playing an album
>   * Show Playing Track always works (no longer requires the Monitor Recent 
> Tracks preference)
>   * iTunes won't launch unless you explicitly do something that should launch 
> it
>   * Volume control is finer grained (jumps by 5% instead of 10%)
>   * Preferences cleaned up
>   * Triggers (and their default keystrokes) cleaned up
>   * Various names and details cleaned up
>   * Better memory management
>
> And not that anyone but me cares, but I was able to rip out almost all 
> AppleScript (which partially explains the speed improvements).
>
> --
> Rob McBroom
> <http://www.skurfer.com/>

Reply via email to