Believe me, a fully functioning automatic updater is very near the top of our to do list, but just not quite at the top yet ;-)
On 24 May 2012 22:04, John Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know how important 64Bit capability for QS is. I can *easily* > download updates oldschool. To me, it's a miracle that QS even exists, > so I'd think improvements to functionality are more important than the > convenience of an automatic updater. > > J > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Roland Dobbins > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On May 25, 2012, at 12:35 AM, Patrick Robertson wrote: > > > >> At the moment, we are working hard moving Quicksilver over to 64 bit, > so we do not have a timeframe for when this will be completed. > > > > At the risk of sounding like an ingrate, I would question the relative > prioritization of these efforts. > > > > "Yes, we're porting it to a 64-bit architecture - too bad you can't > install/update it. But at least the new version which you can't > install/update will be 64-bit enabled." > > > > ;> > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups Quicksilver group. To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, > send email to [email protected]. For > more options, visit this group at > https://groups.google.com/d/forum/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups Quicksilver group. To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, > send email to [email protected]. For > more options, visit this group at > https://groups.google.com/d/forum/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quicksilver group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en
