On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Rob McBroom wrote: > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Howard Melman wrote: > >> I see the distinction, I'm not sure it needs to be exposed to the user. > > Agree. I can’t think of a reason anyone needs to know they’re dealing with > one of these. > > Internally though, it might be nice to define a consistent “type” for these > so we can prevent actions from appearing that make no sense (or so users > could make “Search Contents” the default).
Well, letting users make Search Contents the default action would exposing it to the users. If that's the case then it should be done in the most obvious way possible. Maybe that's just an object type in the actions prefs or maybe there's a catalog collection somewhere. Howard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quicksilver group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en
