On Monday, July 2, 2012 4:13:16 PM UTC+2, Rob McBroom wrote: > > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Howard Melman wrote: > > I see the distinction, I'm not sure it needs to be exposed to the user. > Agree. I can’t think of a reason anyone needs to know they’re dealing with > one of these. > Internally though, it might be nice to define a consistent “type” for > these so we can prevent actions from appearing that make no sense (or so > users could make “Search Contents” the default). >
It absolutely makes sense for me as a user. I'd like to only see 'Objects'. Maybe the internal distinction between 'Collection Objects' and 'Proxy Objects' will open its implementation range. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quicksilver group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en
