On Thu Jul 18 2013 at 22:03:57, Patrick Robertson wrote: > QS is an open community and project, so if any of you guys are in the mood to > suggest alternatives or even to implement that would always be appreciated. > The Achilles heel for almost every developer is that they're always too > interested in developing to bother with the other stuff (I actually think we > have some amazing devs here who do support, development, blogs, wiki > updating… everything so we're really lucky!)
I think this question should be (and perhaps was) directed at the community, and not the devs specifically. My attitude for any project like this where I’m on the outside looking in (which I was with QS for many years) is this: Given the small number of people willing and able to do the programming and the limited time they have, what would I like them to be working on? :-) > Phil's been great of late helping us out on the Twitter/blog front, but if > anybody else wants to help out, we're always open… I’ve said it before, but what Phil does is worth 4 programmers. And don’t overlook users like Jon Stovell that answer tons of questions here. -- Rob McBroom <http://www.skurfer.com/> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
