This would be great! If implemented, I'd be happy to help out with anything 
I could manage to help take some workload off the devs.

On Thursday, May 1, 2014 6:14:52 AM UTC+9, Tony wrote:
>
> Ok, just created issue #1834 
> https://github.com/quicksilver/Quicksilver/issues/1834 which outlines 
> this in a bit more detail. 
>
>
> Tony
>
>
> From: Lucas Garron [email protected] <javascript:>
> Reply: [email protected] <javascript:> 
> [email protected] <javascript:>
> Date: April 29, 2014 at 7:48:15 PM
> To: Blacktree Quicksiler Mailing List 
> [email protected]<javascript:>
> Subject:  Re: Should we move example AppleScripts to github 
>
>  If this happens, we should also consider tackling shell scripts at the 
> same time. 
>
> I, for one, am using a AppleScript files as simple wrappers for a lot of 
> shell scripts just so I can use them as QS objects/actions easily. I would 
> love to maintain them as *what they really are* (shell scripts) instead.
>
> Part of the pain for that also involves $PATH, and figuring out how to 
> move around stdin/stdout/stderr.
>
> »Lucas Garron
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Patrick Robertson 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> That sounds like a really good idea, and not too difficult I don’t think. 
>> Perhaps a v2.0 feature. 
>>
>> Could you please create an issue on GH referencing this topic, and 
>> including the major points? We’d still need someone to review and manage 
>> any AS plugins that are sent, but my idea is that any submissions could 
>> just be sent straight to the QS Dev group for review/discussion.
>>  
>>
>>  On 29 Ebrill 2014, at 02:43, Tony Papale 
>> <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>   What about making scripts first class citizens like plugins? I think 
>> as is scripts are very under utilized because as everyone is saying they 
>> aren’t centralized so its difficult to find them, install them, and update 
>> them. 
>>  
>>  QS already has an *awesome* plugin system that handles updates, version 
>> dependency, etc. so if we can just bundle scripts into pseudo plugins or 
>> perhaps create their own format that would significantly increase their 
>> adoption and creation. Long term it would also be cool to add a simple 
>> script creator right into the pref pane which would just take a name, 
>> description, and code.
>>  
>>  Thoughts?
>>  
>>  Tony
>>
>> From: philostein [email protected] <javascript:>
>> Reply: [email protected] <javascript:> 
>> [email protected] <javascript:>
>> Date: April 28, 2014 at 4:09:14 AM
>> To: [email protected] <javascript:> 
>> [email protected] <javascript:>
>> Subject:  Re: Should we move example AppleScripts to github 
>>
>>  Yes, good idea. 
>>
>> I'd like to volunteer for this, either managing it or helping out with 
>> it. I'd probably need a bit of advice about GitHub from time to time, and I 
>> tend to contribute in spurts. :)
>>
>> It'd also be a good way to host AppleScripts in blog posts and tweets.
>>
>> On Monday, April 28, 2014 9:44:27 AM UTC+9, Patrick wrote: 
>>>
>>> I was thinking about this the other day, the current wiki solution is 
>>> not very user-friendly, and does not really promote sharing of 
>>> AppleScripts. GitHub might still be a little too ‘advanced’ for your 
>>> layman, but it’s probably a good place to start for storing them all in one 
>>> place. 
>>> Perhaps ideally we could have an email address for submitting 
>>> Applescript Actions, and then have one person manage a dedicated portion of 
>>> the website, similar to what say… Alfred have.
>>>
>>>  On 28 Ebrill 2014, at 06:42, Lucas Garron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I've been meaning to collect them and start a pull request to add 
>>> Applescript actions into the Extra Scripts plugin. Since a lot of them are 
>>> of interest to many people without modification, it makes sense to share 
>>> them.
>>>
>>> »Lucas Garron
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:01 PM, David Rees <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>  
>>>> It occurs to me it might be better if the example AppleScripts were in 
>>>> github rather than the wiki. That way folks can submit tweaks easily (and 
>>>> they are easy to sync). And we would just have links in the wiki. 
>>>>
>>>> I've thought about just putting mine in my own repository, but a shared 
>>>> one would probably be better.
>>>>  
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Quicksilver" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Quicksilver" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>  
>>>   --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Quicksilver" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>
>> .
>> To post to this group, send email to 
>> [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Quicksilver" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>
>> .
>> To post to this group, send email to 
>> [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>  
>>   --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Quicksilver" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>
>> .
>> To post to this group, send email to 
>> [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>  
>  
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Quicksilver" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to 
> [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quicksilver" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to