> On Aug 4, 2017, at 12:57 PM, 1.61803 <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 11:19:47 PM UTC+2, hmelman wrote: >> The manual was always meant as a complete description of *everything* QS can >> do with ALL the user tips I could find. > > Well, then my proposal doesn't seem far-fetched, does it?
Well Rob's point that the manual is for users and the qsapp.com wiki can contain information for developers stands (there was always an appendix of some dev notes in the pdf manual, but it was mostly for plugin authors as when I wrote it QS wasn't open sourced yet. I think the dev stuff is better served by a wiki, perhaps it should be on GitHub with the source. Rob's other point that qsapp.com wiki is a bit more open also holds. I was always gathering info from the manual from as many sources as I could and tried to put them in some organized, consistent and non-repetitive format. I'd think of the wiki manual as doc source and qsapp.com as more free for all of user contributions that could eventually make it into the manual. > Anyway, did you try any tool to convert the wiki (back) to pdf? Nope. Doesn't seem to be what people want these days :) > I have tried wikidoc, gitprint, failed… haven't wikito/limedocs yet. Howard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
