On 4/24/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/24/06 15:07 CST: > > > They're in release mode for 2.1.22. > > I think (personal opinion) it is unwise to try to include a security > related package that hasn't seen a release in a year (that gives lots > of time for things to have changed in CVS) in the upcoming BLFS > version. Would it really gain us anything, other than the uncertainty > that stuff might be broken 3-6 months from now?
I agree, I'm not really sure why I said that. I'm not holding my breath for 2.1.22 (well, maybe on my personal system). I'm gonna try to wrap this stuff up this week since I'll be out of town over the weekend. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
