> The descriptions of the OpenOffice patches are confusing. > > 1. The first one listed says it is a 'required' patch for "recent" > versions of X. What is recent? 7.1? 7.0? 6.9? 6.8? It should be > listed so there is no confusion. >
I agree, the other two should begin "Required if" instead of "Optional." I'll fix those right away. The first one, I liked as was, however, if it seemed confusing to you, then less seasoned users will certainly have a problem with it. It is a required patch, no explanation is necessary in the book. It should be sufficient to say 'Required patch:" and let users read the patch header if they wish to know more. I'll go ahead and do that, if you see fit to make a more defined change, please feel free to change it or post to the list and I'll do it. The optional download should also be listed as "Required if..." Thanks for the heads up. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
