On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 03:00:39PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Thomas Trepl wrote these words on 03/01/09 13:51 CST:
> > Am Sonntag, 1. März 2009 19:26:35 schrieb [email protected]:
> >> +# comment this if you did not build cairo
> >> +oac_add_options --enable-system-cairo
> >
> > is that intentionally? or should it be "ac_add_options
> > --enable-system-cairo"
>
> I'm sure it's a typo, but doesn't Firefox use Gtk+ any longer?
>
Yes, it is indeed a typo. [ /me swears at length after reinstalling
xulrunner, firefox, epiphany, and yelp this afternoon to check these
options and one other which I've now dropped because it was
ineffective ] - thanks for spotting it. I don't seem to have
received the mail from the commit yet. Such is life.
> Because if it still does, cairo *will* be installed and there's no
> need to even have this option to comment/uncomment.
>
That I don't understand. From one of my builds yesterday, using
/opt so I could build ff3 on xulrunner (if you try that, be aware that
xulrunner *will* update /etc/gre.d with a version of
1.9.0.6.system.conf which might prevent the ff3 in /usr/bin from
starting - backups are useful!) using --enable-system-cairo :
-DBUILD_STATIC_LIBS= \
-DMOZ_TREE_CAIRO= \
-DMOZ_ENABLE_LIBXUL=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_HUNSPELL= \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_BZ2=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_ZLIB=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_PNG=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_JPEG=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_LCMS=1 \
From what turns out to be a bogus build because of that typo :
-DBUILD_STATIC_LIBS= \
-DMOZ_TREE_CAIRO=1 \
-DMOZ_ENABLE_LIBXUL=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_HUNSPELL= \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_BZ2=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_ZLIB=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_PNG=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_JPEG=1 \
-DMOZ_NATIVE_LCMS=1 \
I am assuming that 'MOZ_NATIVE' equates to 'system' and 'MOZ_TREE'
means use whatever they shipped. ?
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
