On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:59:44PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote these words on 03/01/09 16:44 CST: > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 03:00:39PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > >> Because if it still does, cairo *will* be installed and there's no > >> need to even have this option to comment/uncomment. > > > > That I don't understand. From one of my builds yesterday, using > > /opt so I could build ff3 on xulrunner (if you try that, be aware that > > xulrunner *will* update /etc/gre.d with a version of > > 1.9.0.6.system.conf which might prevent the ff3 in /usr/bin from > > starting - backups are useful!) using --enable-system-cairo : > > You lost me. I'll admit I'm not yet familiar with the FF3 build, but > my question is this: > > Does it still use Gtk+ for rendering? If so, then Gtk+ will be > installed on the system and therefore cairo will also be installed > on the system. Why don't we just default to use the system-installed > copy of cairo? > That's what I'm trying to do. Like all mozilla products, this is poorly documented - google used to know about an arch page that listed the config options, but they seem to have moved to using icecat which might not have the same defaults.
OK, I've looked at firefox, and even with '#define MOZ_TREE_CAIRO 1' it seems to be using the system version. I don't have a build for either xulrunner or stand-alone firefox which didn't specify system-cairo to see how those versions build. s/I don't have/I don't yet have/ # two more builds to go. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
