Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 01/03/10 21:19, [email protected] wrote: >> Author: wblaszcz >> Date: 2010-03-01 03:19:37 -0700 (Mon, 01 Mar 2010) >> New Revision: 8283 >> >> Modified: >> trunk/BOOK/general.ent >> trunk/BOOK/gnome/add/eog.xml >> trunk/BOOK/gnome/core/gnome-session.xml >> trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml >> Log: >> Updated to EOG-2.28.2 > > I just thought I would make a comment on leaving libjpeg-7 as a > recommended package. Going on from the previous thread about appropriate > recommended dependencies some time back, I was tempted to move it to > optional and add the > --without-libjpeg option to the main buid instructions, but I just > couldn't do it without consulting the group. Is this an appriopraite use > of a recommended dependency?
Randy and I have a different opinion. I think the editor making the change should make a judgment call. If a package is significantly enhanced with a dependent package, then I think a recommendation is appropriate. Any reasonable user knows that recommended != required. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
