Randy McMurchy wrote: > What is "significantly enhanced". Is there a criteria to use, or just > if it is significant to *that particular editor*? (DJ and I see it one > way, you see it another way Bruce. No big deal. :-) )
If we trust someone enough to be an editor, then we should trust for this type of decision too. Criteria for something that that has shades of relevancy and is not a pure binary decision doesn't make sense. It's kinda like judging figure skating in the Olympics. The judges make their call on nuances. Our criteria should be "Would a reasonable person want this application without this dependency?" -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
