Didn't realise this had also gone to the lsit. Forwarding my reply now. ----- Forwarded message from Ken Moffat <[email protected]> -----
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 01:02:10 +0100 From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]> To: Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [blfs-book] r20334 - trunk/BOOK/general/prog User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Message-ID: <[email protected]> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 06:48:41PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 08/18/2018 05:23 PM, ken--- via blfs-book wrote: > > Author: ken > > Date: Sat Aug 18 15:23:25 2018 > > New Revision: 20334 > > > > Log: > > The rustaceans are slowly infiltrating the book. Now required by > > thunderbird. For gdb it is only optionalwq so s/used/required/. > > > > We have 4 references to rustc in the book. > > Is the current rustc-1.25.0 good for thunderbird and gdb and firefox and > librsvg. > > -- Bruce I assume it is good enough for thunderbird - Tim updated that, which is where I noticed it. The tree is presumably similar to firefox-60. For firefox-61 (and the last 62-beta I tried), and for current librsvg (version pinned because of a depenency in the latest version), yes. For gdb, don't know. ĸen -- Entropy not found, thump keyboard to continue ----- End forwarded message ----- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
