On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 01:30:03AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-book wrote:
> Didn't realise this had also gone to the lsit. Forwarding my reply
> now.
>
Ok, so I again can't type, but one further comment ...
>
> I assume it is good enough for thunderbird - Tim updated that, which
> is where I noticed it. The tree is presumably similar to
> firefox-60. For firefox-61 (and the last 62-beta I
> tried), and for current librsvg (version pinned because of a
> depenency in the latest version), yes. For gdb, don't know.
>
The only time that I normally build gdb these days is when I'm
building a new system on my ryzen and want to run the tests in rustc:
if I have gdb installed, there is at least a chance that the test
progs will merely dump core rather than eventually rebooting the
box. So, in that situation I don't have rust installed even if I
wanted to run the gdb tests.
And I got asked a few weeks ago if the segfaults in the rust tests
still happened. I think the version then was 1.27.0, and they did.
Not bad for a secure programming language :-(
ĸen
--
Entropy not found, thump keyboard to continue
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
