On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:37:36PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-book wrote:
> On 08/28/2018 09:54 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-book wrote:
> >
> > Please explain why you removed --with-system-boost and
> > --with-system-openssl, your comment that 0.66.0 and 1.0.2 does not
> > agree with my results.
> >
> > I have built 6.1.0.3 with boost_1.68.0 and (only) openssl-1.1.0i on
> > 8.3-rc, and with added java packages (java probably now updated, but
> > using apache-ant-1.10.5 to test the *old* sql deps) on
> > LFS-svn-20180808.
>
> The reason is that the build failed for me with those packages. When I
> removed them, boost-1.66.0 and openssl-1.0.2 were downloaded. This was a
> bit time consuming since I had to go through the build three times. The
> first time the build indicated a failure with boost so I removed
> system-boost. The second with openssl, so I removed system-openssl. The
> third time was successful.
>
> I did not keep logs of the unsuccessful builds.
>
My first attempt with system boost had failed fairly quickly, but
the symlink I added to the boost instructions fixed that. I then
went on and ran my normal build (without junit). Later I did a
DESTDIR build with junit.
For 8.3, the only reasons I had not offered to tag it were that it
was something I had updated (the old "can't see my own omissions"
problem), and that I was not using junit.
When I've updated my scripts to ensure all the packages are current,
I'll try the full book-style libreoffice build on my latest 8.3
system.
Still don't recall seeing any openssl issues with libreoffice in
recent months.
ĸen
--
Also Spuke Zerothruster
(Finnegans Wake)
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
