Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/07/05 18:21 CST:

> Also, does anyone think there should be a comment in the text that if
> net-tools are installed that the patch is not required?

You think the existing text that explains that the IPRoute2 patch
is only necessary if you don't want to install Net-Tools isn't
adequate?

I know my reading of the text explains it where I understand
easily. What more would you suggest we do?

However, I'm all for dumping the patch and just saying Net-Tools
is a required dependency and be done with it until after BLFS-6.0.
I know that's a cop-out, but it sure makes it easy.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
18:24:01 up 5 days, 4:28, 3 users, load average: 0.16, 0.07, 0.02
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to