Randy McMurchy wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote these words on 03/20/05 21:49 CST: > > >>Cool. Thanks Randy. I'll look about the archives a bit, but it really >>looks bad IMO. I'm still looking for opinions. > > > I guess I'm confused as to what you mean. What looks bad? The comment > is in there because our target is LFS-6.0, so there's a comment in > there to help folks that want to render our target version. > > Or, am I confused as too what you're talking about? >
The current symlink to the non current version, which immediately follows the current catalog entry that points to the current stylesheets. :-) Confused more? LOL gtk-doc refuses to build using the instructions in 6.0pre1...maybe the symlink will fix it without the catalog entry. I don't know, I didn't try it because it's optional and I'm not rendering the 6.0 LFS book....maybe that's why it worked when tested previously. BTW, I have held the commit for now. I can remove the text in head as suggested in the original comment, but I'm not sure what should go into 6.0. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
