Matthew Burgess wrote: > If you've any problems with the approach above, let me know.
No. Your approach seems great. We don't get dunned with gcc-4.0 issues and both lfs and blfs get appropriate input. Thanks for the heads up. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
