Robert Connolly wrote: > On April 26, 2005 11:26 pm, DJ Lucas wrote: > >>Yes I see that. 1.1.4 was a very quick release after 1.1.3. I guess I >>renamed the patch a long time ago, but it applies with only 2 offset >>hunks here. Double check those MD5s and please get back to us. >> >>Thanks for checking these out. >> >>-- DJ Lucas >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] openoffice-1.1.4]# md5sum >>../../patches/OOo_1.1.4-gcc_3.4.2+_fixes-1.patch >>c572a09d964e04eefe5db73655cf57f5 >>../../patches/OOo_1.1.4-gcc_3.4.2+_fixes-1.patch > > > $ wget > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/downloads/svn/OOo_1.1.4-gcc_3.4.2+_fixes-1.patch > ... > $ md5sum OOo_1.1.4-gcc_3.4.2+_fixes-1.patch > 07071dde2557b1ca354ad6e4238ae269 OOo_1.1.4-gcc_3.4.2+_fixes-1.patch > > robert
Yep... I butchered the SVN properties! I forgot the ':' character after '$Date' so that all instances of 'Date' are screwed in that patch. Give me about 2 minutes to get a new copy into svn and onto anduin..it'll be here in just a few moments...I think I removed some from the gentoo patch WRT STLport though for the new STLport. BTW the original md5sum I posted is without those property lines. I'll send the new md5sum to the list in a sec as well. http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/BLFS/SVN/M-P/OpenOffice/OOo_1.1.4-gcc_3.4.2+_fixes-2.patch Sorry about that. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
