David Jensen wrote these words on 06/16/05 11:44 CST: > Updating to use user/root instructions: > Balsa-2.2.6 wont compile. I'm using gcc-3.4.4.
You really should be using gcc-3.4.3 as this is what will be in LFS-6.1. I hope there is not any incompatibilities that will somehow affect our BLFS-6.1 release. Is there any way you could install gcc-3.4.3 into /opt and juggle your path so that it is used? > address.c: In function `libbalsa_address_get_edit_widget': > address.c:399: warning: nested extern declaration of `N_' > address.c:399: error: initializer element is not constant > address.c:399: error: (near initialization for `labels[0]') > and so on. > > Balsa 2.3.3 is good, 2.3 branch is said to be *semi-development* > should we use it. Do you want me to test it. :-) > > thoughts? We really need a compelling reason to use non-stable releases. Of course, inability to compile is fairly compelling. :-) Have you search Balsa-CVS and the 'net to see if there are patches? Can you determine what was changed in the 2.3.3 version and create a patch that fixes the issue? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 11:44:01 up 75 days, 11:17, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.09, 0.17 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
