Tushar Teredesai wrote: > Hi: > > I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before releasing > 6.1: > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019 Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple of suggestions in the bug, but I don't see anything definitive.
> * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020 Which of the alternative fixes do you propose we use? > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1458 OK > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463 How well has the proposed patch been tested? > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1468 OK > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1472 OK > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1473 OK > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1474 OK > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1477 Do we have confirmation of the problem (or the fix)? > As a trade-off most of the package update bugs targetted for 6.1 can > be postponed. Right now there are 38 outstanding 6.1 bugs. Of these, 14 have been accepted by editors. Which bugs do you suggest we postpone? Several of these probably are pretty quick: 1362, 1380, 1430, 1434, 1447, 1448, 1453, 1364, 1365. I think we should probably defer 1433, 1449, 1451. I'm open to specific suggestions like you gave above. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
