Richard A Downing wrote: > M.Canales.es wrote: >>Now that the trunk Changelog is yet small, maybe we can move on their format >>to the new layout used in the cross-lfs book. See, for example, the >>"Changelog entries" section in >> >>http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/cross-lfs/x86/introduction/changelog.html >> >>IMHO, that layout is more clean and easy to read.
> I'm not in favour of this. I like the strict chrono order of the > current changelog. IMO, the new one is more cluttered (more sections), > and I find it more difficult to find what I want ( the list of changes > since I last looked ). I'd go so far as to say I think LFS should go > back to the BLFS way! > > -1 >From your comment and Randy's comment, I don't think we all understood the proposal the same way. Manuel, can you create a demo page of exactly what you are proposing for BLFS? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
