Randy McMurchy wrote: > M.Canales.es wrote these words on 08/17/05 13:43 CST: > > >>I'm speaking about the real changelog entries, the ones grouped by date and >>divided by editor/change. > > > Oh, well why didn't you say so? :-) > > Seems to me the only difference is that the date is only listed once > for each day there is a change. Everything for that date is then listed > under that as a sub-bullet. > > Is that correct? > > If so, then I like that change. It does appear a tad neater without > having the date on every line item. >
Me too. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
