M.Canales.es wrote: > El Miércoles, 17 de Agosto de 2005 20:44, Richard A Downing escribió: > >>M.Canales.es wrote: > > >>I'm not in favour of this. I like the strict chrono order of the >>current changelog. IMO, the new one is more cluttered (more sections), >>and I find it more difficult to find what I want ( the list of changes >>since I last looked ). > > > The chrono order is already on that new layout. For each day, the more newest > change should be placed above of the other ones. >
All I WAS objecting to was the sections BEFORE the changelog in the example cited. I don't like that even in LFS. I'm happy with the proposal to group all entries on the same date together if everyone else agrees. But consider this: The current format works well too - and has the advantage of being searchable in the rendered version with the results each containing a date. Of course one can always search the XML and get that functionality. Does this mean a big change in the markup that we have to edit - does it introduce any more error prone-ness? R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
