Archaic wrote these words on 09/26/05 00:56 CST: > I've always preferred to segregate them in their own group. But if the > group ID is truly never going to be used, and there is no security > implication of allowing these types of programs to share a group, then > perhaps the nogroup group?
That is a good idea. Let's see if others respond with any different suggestions. If not, I'll go with nogroup and change the PostgreSQL instructions as well. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 01:09:01 up 1 day, 9:33, 3 users, load average: 1.00, 0.85, 0.47 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
