Richard A Downing wrote:
my
experience is that others on the team quite often (and usually rightly)
criticise my decisions - this makes me unwilling to make the attempt
unless it's a very simple case. I'm not sure that there are many simple
cases anymore, at least not with Xorg going modular and gcc-4.
To put it simply, I just don't enjoy being an editor - and I'm
embarrased that I have not felt able to do more. Maybe I'm missing
something, so please help me make up my mind.
If I were you I would stay and just look after the pages for the packages you use. Obviously there's Bluefish but maybe you could adopt some others? If you just take care of a few things it's not a great pressure, keeps you involved with the project and it helps to spread the work out. Then if people disagree about other things, well, it's not so important. I think it's good to have a diverse spread of opinions, as long as there's a core group who can work together constructively.
<off topic>It seems to me that there is some dead wood that should be pruned from
BLFS. glib-1.2 hasn't been able to compile unpatched since gcc-3.3. I'd drop it as
unmaintained, along with all the gtk1 applications. Gnome-1, Xmms, bin the lot of them.
That would create some space for some new things. Maybe there should be a page about
OpenBox?</off topic>
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
