DJ Lucas wrote: > Okay...my previous suggestion absolutely sucked using killdelay. Thanks > for the 70 second warning Bruce. BTW, HUP seems odd to me, but I'll > know about that in a short time. I just can't help but think that > Nathan I talked about that script at one time or another, but can't find > anything on it. Anyway, if that works as expected, then it works, just > need to handle the unconditional 10 second wait. I don't have a good > solution for it though, so it may be the only safe way. Only thing I > can think of is that maybe a test (kill -0) against the lowest numbered > (parent?) process is sufficient, but I'm not there yet.
When we start rpc.nfsd, we start 8 processes in the init script. Actually, this really starts the process in the kernel as that is where nfsd really runs. The only way to communicate is via signals. I don't see there a kill -0 would do anything. I did try killing the lowest numbered nfsd process, but it only killed that one process. The others continued to run. - -Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
