Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
Should we ask the LFS guys to take that out of their rules, so that we
can deal with it in BLFS? This kind of relates to my comment that the
explanation for some of this is buried in the LFS book (well the alsa
modules stuff anyway).
This is buried in the LFS book for a reason: this kind of modprobe trick
for "recommended" dependencies between the modules is not ALSA-specific.
See
So, how is the current situation with
"Metaproblem 7: no useful documentation"? I ask because I still haven't
seen a mention of something as simple as 'OPTIONS="last_rule"' other
than I found it in sombody else's rules file. "Try and see if this
works.">>"Yeah! It does!" isn't seen around the lists too much yet
either. :-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
