Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 10/28/05 14:29 CST: > Randy McMurchy wrote: >>But then, this would be no different than the inetutils instructions. > > OK, I think I see what is meant. I'm not sure what you mean with your > reference to inetutils, but BIND Utils and BIND are two sets of install > instructions for the same package.
Inetutils, like NTP installs servers and client in the same set of instructions. And both packages are only located in the "Basic Networking Programs" section. > The difference I see here is that a user would always install all the > executables. That's the way ntp works. That's also the way CVS, SVN, Samba and probably others are as well. All of the executables are installed, it is just configuration differences which separate the server and the client instructions. I should probably not contribute to this thread any longer, because I was just guessing as to what Archaic's intentions were. We may be discussing something off-topic as to what he was saying. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 14:32:00 up 33 days, 22:56, 3 users, load average: 0.10, 0.14, 0.42 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
