Greg Schafer wrote these words on 12/05/05 04:38 CST: > 100% agreed. I never understood why the BLFS book chose to fly in the > face of conventional upstream wisdom.
Because no matter how you execute the configuration stage, you end up with the *same exact* thing. I would have thought you knew that. And last time I asked the group which way to go, it was determined to stay the way we have it. Now, unless there is some real compelling reason to stay the way we have it, I'll be changing the build method to use what *the group* now has decided is the better build method. > [snip other good stuff] Thanks for the comments Greg. I'll let this thread die out, and then incorporate all the suggestions into the new build method. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 04:55:00 up 71 days, 14:19, 3 users, load average: 0.28, 0.10, 0.10 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
