Archaic wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:23:39AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >>I got a reply from upstream. Daniel Veillard recommends not compiling >>with history. What I'm thinking about doing is removing the history >>from the default instructions but leave it in the explanation with the >>appropriate note. > > > Does he recommend that to fix the situation at hand, or does he > generally discourage that configure switch. If the former, then my > previous email stands. If the latter, then it seems like a no brainer. >
This is what I got: >>This seems to be triggered by the tab characters embedded in the >> whitex.script. Could these be changed to spaces? No, it's important to test the behaviour when the public identifiers uses tabs. >> I'd appreciate any insight you could provide. Don't compile with history ! It's not by default, and when turned on readline gives a problem... Or ignore the regression test failure then. ------------ We can't ignore the test failure because it causes a hang. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
