Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hmmmm, we really need consistent results. Here is my method, could
> you please duplicate my procedure and see what happens?
OK. I downloaded a fresh copy of jai-1_1_2_01-lib-linux-i586-jdk.bin
and duplicated your results. The checksum passes. Upon investigation,
I was changing the .bin file with vi and after exiting, I get:
[bdubbs@/tmp/fop]$ diff jai-1_1_2_01-lib-linux-i586-jdk.bin
/usr/src/fop/jai-1_1_2_01-lib-linux-i586-jdk.bin
80c80
< tail -n +122 $0 > $outname
---
> tail +122 $0 > $outname
10111c10111
< ]11
jre/lib/ext/jai_core.jarUT|0KAUxP]11û
q¦
ÙÔ'jre/lib/ext/mlibwrapper_jai.jarUTëÁ>UxPK¶¥¡
---
> ]11
jre/lib/ext/jai_core.jarUT|0KAUxP]11û
q¦
ÙÔ'jre/lib/ext/mlibwrapper_jai.jarUTëÁ>UxPK¶¥¡
\ No newline at end of file
--------------------------
So vi was corrupting the binary. If I start over with vi -b jai...
the checksum does not fail. I think I need to reinstall. :)
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
