Randy McMurchy wrote: > Quite frankly, I don't feel like "looking out for potential problems". > I'd just rather update the package and be done with it. You know, > make an informed decision and go with it. > > So, trying to rephrase the question here. We have some choices. > > 1. Accept the new default output device to the bbox driver. This > behavior is different than what has been in the past. > > 2. Change the default driver to the 'x11' screen output as it has > always been in the past. A simple sed before building the package > accomplishes this. > > Please, Bruce, as the BLFS editor please respond that we should > either do (1) or (2). I don't care. I just want to update the > package and close the bug.
What we have here is a failure to communicate... Do number 2. *If* we (or someone else) sees problems in -support or other places we will reevaluate. I didn't expect you to do anything else special. I'll try to be more direct... -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
