Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 12/19/05 14:40 CST: > On 12/19/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Here is where Tush and I disagree with the direction the "Recommended" >>dependencies has gone. Who decides what is "basic/common features >>expected by the users"? > > I think you meant Bruce. I agree with you on the Recommended > dependencies. In fact, I went a step further and proposed that the > book only have Required and Optional Dependencies with a note if some > critical functionality is disabled if the dependency is not fulfilled.
Actually, I did mean you. Sorry for the confusion, and I see how it could be construed the way you took it. However, it was my intention to describe that you and I agreed on the point. Again, sorry for my poor wordsmithing. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 14:43:01 up 86 days, 7 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.23 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
