Hi all,

Please forgive [ignore] my intrusion to the list if it is unwelcome.

I have been reading the recent threads on Alex's work on UTF-8 with interest.

As a UK (English) based LFS user/builder I have, so far, had no problem using a standard LFS build. However, it has seemed to me that almost all new IT systems and Web Services platforms are using UTF-8 encoding. I am therefore planning to build my next LFS as a UTF-8.

My point to this list is really about the "whys"...

* Why is UTF-8 important to linux users (especially English speaking)?
* Why should anyone bother about it in the first place?
* What does UTF-8 offer that ISO-8859-x does not?

I think this could do with a bit of discussion. The USA/English world doesn't, on the face of it, have anything to gain from going to a UTF-8 based format, however, I believe this is the way forward for *everyone* and should perhaps have a greater emphasis in the LFS project as a whole. Aren't most of the major linux distributions now using UTF-8?

If I can help, Alex, I would be happy to help build/develop an english language UTF-8 system for comparison/analysis.

Apologies if this is noise....

Al

LFS ID: 216

--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to