On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:26:41PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > This brings up another point I was thinking about. Should dbus and hal > really be in LFS instead of BLFS? It seems like it is pretty much core > functionality.
No, it is automated functionality not core functionality. There is no more reason for dbus/hal in LFS than supermount or automount. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
