Randy McMurchy wrote:
Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/05/06 01:10 CST:
5. Reduce workload by reducing the number of packages in BLFS and
allowing users to be less dependent on it, since it's not supposed to be
a comprehensive guide to installing every piece of software someone
might want to use (or is it?).
BLFS, like LFS, is a learning tool, with the expectation that folks
have some clue of what is going on, what their goal is, etc. What do
you envision BLFS should be, Chris?
As I said, I don't really know myself. I just added the idea to the list.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
