Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/22/06 01:25 CST: > I was about to correct this by simply submitting a patch to remove the > remaining references, but I notice that for several packages it > specifically says that Berkeley DB is "Recommended (over GDBM) - > installed in LFS" so I would have to assume it's deliberate. Is there a > reason for these references, or should they all be removed?
If I left it in there (especially if it is somewhere where GDBM is mentioned as well), then it was deliberate. Knowing where and what specifically you are talking about would be really helpful in this instance. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 02:01:01 up 119 days, 11:25, 3 users, load average: 0.65, 0.20, 0.09 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
