Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/23/06 15:32 CST: > On 1/23/06, Thomas Trepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Did anyone saw that problem too? If yes, i would vote for moving doxygen from >>"optional" to "required" in the libexif chapter.
I would rather fix the problem instead of forcing folks to install something that really and truly should be optional. > The problem is that in the doc/Makefile, if configure doesn't find > Doxygen, it comments out the targets called install-apidocs > install-apidocs-internal. Unfortunately, these are referenced in the > standard make install, so make bombs. Actually, the installation bombs. However, it is still a problem we gotta fix. > This is the hack fix that I came up with that would break the Doxygen build: > > cat >> doc/Makefile.in << "EOF" > install-apidocs: > install-apidocs-internals: > EOF Seems simple enough. Did you happen to notify anyone upstream? > Also, the includedir in libexif/libexif.pc.in is screwed up. You > won't find this until you try to build something that depends on > libexif. It defaults to @includedir@, however the headers are > actually installed in @includedir@/libexif. To fix this, the > following sed can be used: > > sed -i.orig 's|^includedir.*|&/@PACKAGE@|' \ > libexif/libexif.pc.in I'll look into this and try to fix this package up today sometime. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 15:33:00 up 121 days, 57 min, 3 users, load average: 0.24, 0.23, 0.43 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
