DJ Lucas wrote these words on 02/05/06 12:41 CST: > DJ Lucas wrote: >>For now, the second make >>target should be changed to 'linux_shlib' (if a libunzip is useful to >>you). > > Does anyone have any objections to the above change?
What is the accompanying text going to say? How does dropping linking to libz change the library? How is the functionality changed? Why has *nobody* ever mentioned this before? Don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing against the change, but what I've read so far, all you've really done is say, "this made it work for me". I'm the kind of guy that wants to know *why* it now works, and *what* was making it not work before. I can then decide if I have any objections. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 13:06:01 up 133 days, 22:30, 3 users, load average: 1.54, 0.85, 0.37 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
