Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/08/06 10:03 CST:
> Thanks, Juerg. I think I may make a patch that uses the
> MOZ_NATIVE_NSPR and MOZ_NATIVE_NSS (introduced in the firefox nss
> patch) to suppress the installation of firefox-{nss,nspr}.pc. I think
> we're all in agreement that these are inappropriate.
Yes, with system-installed NSS/NSPR the .pc files are broken, however,
I don't think suppressing the installation of them is proper. Keep in
mind that some packages use these .pc files to discover where NSS is
installed.
They look for the presence of firefox-nss/nspr.pc,
thunderbird-nss/nspr.pc and mozilla-nss/nspr.pc.
Tell me, what do we gain by patching to remove them, when we patch
to *fix* them already. To me, removing them is a step backward.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
10:02:00 up 136 days, 19:26, 3 users, load average: 0.88, 0.34, 0.17
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
