On 3/16/06, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > You're probably right about Type1 fonts being an issue, but I don't > > think bitmapped fonts are ignored. > > I think you're right about bitmap fonts.
Hey, Andy, here's a test I thought of. I'm not on my Linux box to do it myself, and you seem like you have a good setup for the test. In /etc/fonts/conf.d, there should be a file called no-bitmaps.conf (in fontconfig-2.3.2+ there is). Change the name to 10-no-bitmaps.conf or make a symbolic link. fc will only read files in that directory that start with 2 numbers. The contents of that file tell fc to reject non-scalable fonts. After restarting X, you can see if the behavior with firefox is the same. Might have to look at fc-cache and fc-list to see if fc actually updated or not. I don't know it's behavior in that respect. fc-list alone would probably be enough to see whether it skips the bitmap fonts by default. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
