Archaic wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:11:51AM -0600, Tushar Teredesai wrote: >> Been there:) >> http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-dev/2006-January/013009.html > > Bruce, looking at that thread and this current one, I simply cannot find > a valid reason for keeping the debian patch around and I certainly can't > find reason we should be using debian's versioning scheme. This is all > assuming we stay at 1.7. I do not (and likely will not) have sufficient > evidence to say that 1.10.x is compatible, but for 1.7, a sed or tiny > patch to popt.c is sufficient. That and stripping the hideous -5 from > the version number.
Did you see my post yesterday? "OK, if it isn't doing anything for us, then we don't need to use it, but I think we need to say why we aren't using the "latest" version. I just saw Dan's comment and that makes this discussion moot as far as popt goes." -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
